The ontological argument is a play on words and many philosophers since anselm have ripped it to shreds what use is the ontological argument today? Dr David Webster answers a question sent in from Essex… Find us on twitter […]
Why would you suggest that by using logic and reasoning, it provides a better argument for the existence of God than using empirical evidence?Dr David Webster answers questions all the way from Essex..
A question sent in by a school – about the Ontological argument Do you agree that the ontological argument is flawed because it begins with an inductive definition and does it provide a useful argument to prove the […]
Ok, they’re not videos – but our colleague Dr William Large makes a number of his lectures public: these can be found at http://drwilliamlarge.wordpress.com/ – and should be of interest to anyone studying philosophy.. We hope to post some videos […]
Dr David Webster from the University of Gloucestershire talks about an aspect of Buddhist thought. In this case, the Three Marks of Conditioned Phenomena – Anicca, Anatta & Dukkha. ——- Staff from the Religion, Philosophy & Ethics course at University […]